The prompt kit for qualifying your prospects with AI
The prompts and framework to have an AI agent sort your prospects for you: qualification, intent scoring, and prioritization. Free to use, no sign-up required.
By the end, an agent sorts your prospects for you, and you keep only the three that matter.
Every prompt in this kit is free to use. Copy it, paste in your data, and run it. No sign-up, no email required.
How to use it
The qualification prompt takes a prospect’s raw information (title, company, detected signal) and returns a score out of 18 with a recommendation. Connect it to your lead source and you get automatic sorting.
The 3-question framework is the human guardrail: before a message goes out, it forces you to name the signal, the pain, and what makes you irreplaceable.
The checklist goes straight into your CRM as a qualification scorecard shared by the whole team.
The limitation to keep in mind
A standalone prompt qualifies one prospect at a time. Scaling up, with hundreds of prospects sorted every week and connected to your real buying signals, takes an agent that orchestrates these steps continuously. That’s exactly what we build.
The kit, ready to copy
-
Prompt
Prompt · qualify a prospect on 6 criteria
You are a sales analyst. Using the information below about a prospect, evaluate them on 6 criteria (company size, industry, buying signal, likely budget, urgency, product fit). Score each criterion from 0 to 3, give a total score out of 18, and finish with a one-line recommendation: “prioritize,” “nurture,” or “disqualify.” Prospect information: """ {{ PASTE THE PROSPECT INFORMATION HERE }} """ -
Framework
Framework · 3 questions to answer before you write to a prospect
1. What recent signal proves they have the problem now (and not six months from now)? 2. What exact words would they use to describe this problem? 3. What makes MY approach impossible to replace with a tool they already have? -
Template
Template · qualification checklist (copy it into your CRM)
Download
Read next
-
Buying signals
Signal-based personalization in 2026: it’s not a merge field
A first name dropped into a template is still a template: across more than 20 million emails, Woodpecker measures a 17 to 18% reply rate for messages built on a real event at the prospect, versus 7 to 9% for merge fields alone. A campaign built on individual signals reached a 64.7% read rate on 797 messages sent to radiologists in six countries. Here’s what separates the two approaches.
-
Outbound
Prospect database size: a vanity metric in 2026
A large prospect database predicts no sales. In a 2025 Validity report (n=602), 76% of CRM teams say less than half of their data is accurate, and an exclusion method (scrape broadly, then disqualify tightly) turns a dormant file into a list that converts, as a French MedTech company showed by keeping only a minority of qualified profiles. What predicts a sale is the signal isolated within the database, not its volume.
-
Outbound
Prospecting ROI in 2026: measure budget, not leads
Counting leads predicts no sales: in a lead-centric process, fewer than 1% of contacts end up as signed deals (Forrester). The only number that matters is the sales budget redeployed toward prospects with an active signal, and the pipeline that fills up behind it. Here’s how to measure prospecting in sales time recovered and meetings booked, not in volume.