The recap waits until Friday
After three visits in one day, it gets written at the end of the week, from memory.
Deals · Founding program
With a handful of founding teams, we’re building everything that follows a hospital visit: the recap, a draft proposal, answers to the IT security questionnaire drawn from your own documents, and a follow-up for every stakeholder. Your rep reviews and sends. For every deal, you’ll know who has said yes, and who’s still missing.
Pick a time that suits you. Instant confirmation, reminder the day before.
A 12- to 18-month sales cycle. One head of department on board, then biomedical engineering, hospital IT, senior management, and purchasing to win over in turn. Every week without an answer lets the project cool off.
After three visits in one day, it gets written at the end of the week, from memory.
Security, health data hosting, GDPR, interoperability: dozens of questions that hold up the deal for weeks.
Nobody has met biomedical engineering, purchasing knows nothing about the project, and you only find out at order time.
The head of department who backed the project leaves, and nobody reaches out to their successor.
The day before: the department, its latest dated signals, the incumbent competitor, the people already met, and the questions to ask.
As you walk out of the department: the visit recap, the objections, the people mentioned, and the next step.
The goal: a draft proposal ready for review 30 minutes after the visit, in the department’s own words, built to circulate all the way to the committee.
Security, hosting, GDPR, interoperability: every answer drawn from your own documents, with its source.
For every deal: who has said yes, who is waiting on an answer, who hasn’t been met yet. Each follow-up is ready at the right moment.
Every visit you’ve made, linked to deals won and lost: the objections that keep coming up, what gets a department to sign.
Debrief · on your way out
Everything that matters for the next step is captured, along with who said it. Your rep corrects anything that needs it and never retypes a thing.
Cardiology · visit on Thursday, October 8, 10:00 to 10:50 AM
Monitor patients remotely after discharge to reduce readmissions.
Source: visit notes
Not one extra minute for the nurses: training has to fit into shift handovers.
Source: visit notes
Biomedical engineering will sign off on maintenance, hospital IT on security.
Source: visit notes
Could go to the November equipment committee.
Source: visit notes
Draft proposal to the head of department by October 20; ask hospital IT for its questionnaire.
Noted in the recap, with both deadlines.Proposal · 30-minute goal
They’ll find their own words, numbers and timeline in a clear document they can forward all the way to the committee. Your rep reviews it, settles scope, indicative price, and timing, then sends it.
Draft proposal ready for review
Visit on Thursday, October 8, ended at 10:50 AM
To be forwarded to the committee: no quote to sign; the purchase follows the hospital’s procurement process.
“My nurses don’t have a single extra minute for a new tool.”
Section 2: on-site training during shift handovers, in two half-days.
“Hospital IT will have to approve it, and they take their time.”
Section 4: hospital IT’s security questionnaire will be completed as soon as it arrives.
IT security questionnaire
Every answer is drawn from your own documents, with its source. Anything they don’t cover is left to your team, never guessed.
Security questionnaire
48 questions: security, hosting, GDPR, interoperability
45 answers drawn from your documents, 3 left to your team.
“Is health data hosted by a certified health data host (HDS)?”
Yes, certificate attached. Source: your security file, page 4.
“Does the device integrate with the electronic health record?”
Yes, through HL7 FHIR; list of connected EHR vendors attached. Source: your interoperability sheet.
Decision map
Head of department, nurse manager, biomedical engineering, hospital IT, purchasing: for every deal, every stakeholder, where they stand, and the next follow-up. If your champion moves on, a message to their successor is ready for review that same week.
5 stakeholders · updated October 15
Champions the project; wants to take it to the November committee.
Source: October 8 visit
Agrees, as long as training fits into shift handovers.
Source: October 8 visit
Waiting for the maintenance sheet; follow-up ready for Tuesday.
Source: October 12 email
Security questionnaire returned on October 14.
Source: October 14 email
No contact yet: an introduction is ready, to go through the head of department.
Source: decision map
A message to their successor, ready for review that same week.
The job change is spotted, and the follow-up is ready for review.Your rep reviews everything before it goes out: draft proposal, answer to hospital IT, follow-up.
Scope, indicative price, timeline: they decide from their phone, between visits.
Missing information becomes a question to ask, never a guess.
Technical answers only come from documents you have approved, every sentence with its source.
Participants are told at the start and can say no. Without a recording, your rep’s notes are enough.
Recaps, draft proposals and questionnaires cover the department and the project, never an individual patient.
Everything we prepare is delivered to you as documents; when the contract ends, we hand it all back.
Your data is hosted in Germany. You get the list of our subprocessors before kickoff.
Founding program
For four weeks, our team preps your next ten hospital visits and turns each one into a recap and a draft proposal the same day. We also complete three IT security questionnaires or committee files from your documents. You shape the product; we measure what it gets you.
Spots are limited: we take on a few teams each quarter so we can hit our turnaround times. Your subscription only starts if you choose to, after the review.
Four-week pilot
One call to look at this week’s visits and see whether the founding program is right for you. You’ll get our proposal the same day.